Manage your drone business with PilotLedger — the all-in-one platform for commercial UAS operators.
Home/Michigan

Michigan Drone Laws

Complete guide for commercial and recreational UAS operators

Moderate Regulatory Environment
1

State Overview

Michigan maintains a moderate regulatory posture with statewide preemption of local drone ordinances, strong privacy and harassment protections, and targeted restrictions on critical infrastructure and wildlife interference. The state lacks a dedicated critical infrastructure statute but is actively considering comprehensive new drone regulations through the pending SHIELD package.

2

State Drone Laws

MCL § 259.301 et seq.

Michigan Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act

General

Michigan's core drone statute (Public Act 436 of 2016) establishes statewide ground rules for drone conduct, creates the Michigan UAS framework, and preempts almost all local regulation of drone ownership and operation.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Misdemeanor under MCL § 259.323 — up to 90 days imprisonment and/or up to $500 fine
View source
MCL § 259.305

Preemption of Local Drone Regulation

Preemption

Political subdivisions (cities, villages, townships, counties) are prohibited from enacting or enforcing ordinances or resolutions that regulate the ownership or operation of unmanned aircraft, except for regulation of the subdivision's own UAS fleet or locally-owned airports.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Ordinances in violation are unenforceable
View source
MCL § 259.321

Interference with Emergency Responders

criminal

Knowingly and intentionally operating a UAS in a manner that interferes with the official duties of police, fire, search-and-rescue, EMS, or other emergency-response officials is prohibited.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Misdemeanor — up to 90 days imprisonment and/or up to $500 fine
View source
MCL § 259.322

Harassment, Stalking, and Personal Protection Order Violations

harassment

Prohibits knowingly and intentionally operating a UAS to violate terms of a personal protection order, subject another person to harassment or stalking under MCL § 750.411h or § 750.411i, or capture photographs, video, or audio of another person in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress. Also prohibits registered sex offenders from using a UAS to follow, contact, or capture images of a minor.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Misdemeanor — up to 90 days imprisonment and/or up to $500 fine
View source
MCL § 750.539j

Surveillance of Private Place

Privacy

Makes it unlawful to surveil, photograph, or film an individual in a 'private place' (where a person reasonably expects privacy) without consent. Applies to drone operators hovering cameras at bedroom windows or over fenced yards.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Misdemeanor — up to 2 years imprisonment and/or up to $2,000 fine for a first offense; up to 5 years and/or $5,000 for repeat offense
View source
MCL § 750.539c

Two-Party Consent for Audio Recording

Privacy

Michigan is a two-party-consent state for recording oral communications. A drone carrying a live microphone that picks up a private conversation without the consent of every party violates this statute.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Felony — up to 2 years imprisonment and/or up to $2,000 fine
View source
MCL § 324.40111c

Wildlife Interference and Hunting Prohibition

hunting

Prohibits using a UAS to assist in the taking of an animal, locate game, or harass an animal. Narrow exception exists for recovering a downed, lawfully taken deer, elk, or bear only if no one in the hunting party is actively hunting at the time of the recovery flight.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Misdemeanor — up to 90 days imprisonment and/or $500-$1,000 fine for first offense; up to 1 year imprisonment and/or $1,000-$2,500 fine for second and subsequent offenses, plus possible hunting/fishing license revocation
View source
Mich. Admin. Code R. 318.146

Mackinac Island State Park Commission Unmanned Aircraft Rule

General

Prohibits the use or operation of an unmanned aircraft without proper written permission on Mackinac Island State Park Commission-administered lands.

Effective: Jan 1, 2024Subject to confiscation and park management enforcement
View source
DNR Order 5.1 (State Parks and Recreation Areas)

Michigan DNR Unmanned Aircraft Policy in State Parks

General

Prohibits drone operation that interferes with DNR employees performing duties, interferes with search and rescue operations, within 100 yards of cultural or historical sites/structures, over occupied beach areas, equestrian facilities, restrooms, open-air changing courts, or areas subject to aerial right-of-way. Commercial operations require written DNR permission.

Effective: Jan 1, 2019Permit denial, confiscation, enforcement by DNR conservation officers
View source
MCL § 750.45a

Interference with Key or Critical Facility

Critical Infrastructure

Prohibits interference with key or critical facilities. While Michigan lacks a dedicated drone-specific critical infrastructure statute, this general statute has been interpreted to apply to unauthorized drone operations near critical facilities.

Effective: Apr 4, 2017Felony — up to 4 years imprisonment and/or up to $2,500 fine
View source
3

Local/Municipal Ordinances

Town of West Bloomfield

township
Parks No-Fly Zone Ordinance

Establishes all town parks managed by West Bloomfield Parks and Recreation Commission as drone no-fly zones.

Restrictions

Recreational and commercial drone operations prohibited in all West Bloomfield parks

View source

University of Michigan

city
University of Michigan Policy on Operation of UAS

Prohibits operation of drones over any University of Michigan campus or property except when prior authorization has been granted through an application process reviewed by the Institutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC) and approved by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

Restrictions

Outdoor UAS operations banned without waiver. Indoor operations allowed in buildings with established UAS safety policies with building manager permission. Exceptions for law enforcement and designated outdoor locations.

View source

Mt. Brighton Ski Resort

city
Vail Resorts Property Drone Policy

Prohibits recreational and commercial drone use by guests or members of the public on Vail Resorts property, except in limited circumstances when an approved operator has obtained FAA exemption and written resort permission.

Restrictions

No drone use without FAA exemption and resort approval. Limited exceptions for special events, marketing, and film/photo applications with prior written authorization.

View source
4

Penalty & Fine Schedule

Harassment, stalking, PPO violation via UAS (MCL § 259.322(1)-(3))

ClassificationMisdemeanor
FineUp to $500
ImprisonmentUp to 90 days
EnforcementMichigan State Police, County Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement

Sentencing judges may impose probation and no-contact conditions

Registered sex offender UAS operation against minor (MCL § 259.322(4))

ClassificationMisdemeanor
FineUp to $500
ImprisonmentUp to 90 days
EnforcementMichigan State Police, County Prosecutors

Sex offenders prohibited from using UAS to follow, contact, or photograph minors

Emergency responder interference (MCL § 259.321)

ClassificationMisdemeanor
FineUp to $500
ImprisonmentUp to 90 days
EnforcementMichigan State Police, County Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement

Applies to police, fire, EMS, search-and-rescue

Surveillance of private place (MCL § 750.539j)

ClassificationMisdemeanor (first offense); Felony (repeat)
FineUp to $2,000 (first); Up to $5,000 (repeat)
ImprisonmentUp to 2 years (first); Up to 5 years (repeat)
EnforcementCounty Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement

Applies to filming in locations where reasonable expectation of privacy exists

Non-consensual audio recording (MCL § 750.539c)

ClassificationFelony
FineUp to $2,000
ImprisonmentUp to 2 years
EnforcementCounty Prosecutors

Two-party consent required for recording oral communications; applies to drone-mounted microphones

Wildlife interference / hunting aid (MCL § 324.40111c)

ClassificationMisdemeanor (first); Misdemeanor with enhancement (repeat)
Fine$500-$1,000 (first); $1,000-$2,500 (repeat)
ImprisonmentUp to 90 days (first); Up to 1 year (repeat)
EnforcementDNR Conservation Officers

Hunting/fishing license revocation possible; report violations to 1-800-292-7800

Interference with critical or correctional facility (MCL § 750.45a)

ClassificationFelony
FineUp to $2,500
ImprisonmentUp to 4 years
EnforcementFederal authorities, County Prosecutors

Addresses interference with power plants, refineries, water treatment facilities

Unauthorized UAS operation on Mackinac Island State Park land (Mich. Admin. Code R. 318.146)

ClassificationAdministrative
FineConfiscation
ImprisonmentNone
EnforcementMackinac State Historic Parks Rangers

Aircraft subject to confiscation on spot; written permit required from park superintendent

UAS operation in DNR state park without permit (DNR Order 5.1)

ClassificationAdministrative
FinePermit denial, potential confiscation
ImprisonmentNone
EnforcementDNR Parks and Recreation Division, DNR Conservation Officers

Applies to all state-managed land; 100-yard buffer from cultural sites enforced

Stadium TFR violation (14 CFR § 99.7)

ClassificationFederal violation (civil and criminal)
FineFive-figure civil penalties typical
ImprisonmentPossible federal criminal charges
EnforcementFAA, Federal law enforcement

Applies within 3 nautical miles of stadiums with 30,000+ seats during covered events

NPS land drone operation (36 CFR § 1.5)

ClassificationFederal petty offense
FineUp to $5,000
ImprisonmentUp to 6 months
EnforcementNational Park Service, U.S. Magistrate Court (Western District of Michigan)

Applies to Sleeping Bear Dunes, Pictured Rocks, Isle Royale, Keweenaw NHP

5

Registration Requirements

State Registration

Not Required

State Permit

Required

State Insurance

Not Required

Michigan does not require separate state-level drone registration. Federal FAA registration ($5 per drone for 3 years) is the only registration requirement for drones over 0.55 pounds.

State-level permits required for commercial operations on DNR-managed land (state parks, state forests, recreation areas) and all operations on Mackinac Island State Park Commission land. DNR commercial-filming permits required in addition to standard Part 107 credentials. Local parks may also require advance permission for takeoff/landing on municipally-owned property.

Not required by state law, but $1 million general liability coverage is commonly required by commercial clients. Insurance is recommended for recreational operators.

6

Applicable Federal Regulations

FAA Part 107 Certification

Commercial drone operations in Michigan must comply with FAA Part 107 Small UAS Rule requirements

All commercial drone pilots in Michigan must obtain an FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate by passing the FAA Aeronautical Knowledge Test ($175 fee). The certificate is valid for 24 months and requires recurrent testing. Michigan has PSI testing centers in Detroit, Grand Rapids, Lansing, Ann Arbor, Traverse City, and Marquette. Part 107 compliance is enforced by the FAA at the federal level; Michigan does not add separate commercial licensing requirements.

Recreational Drone TRUST Certification

All recreational drone pilots in Michigan must pass the FAA's TRUST (Recreational UAS Safety Test)

Recreational pilots must pass the free, online TRUST test before flying and carry proof of certification. The test is available through FAA-approved test administrators and covers safety, airspace, and regulatory requirements. Michigan does not add separate recreational licensing; FAA TRUST is the baseline requirement.

FAA Remote ID

All drones flown outdoors in Michigan must broadcast Remote ID information

Mandatory since March 16, 2024. Every drone flown outdoors must broadcast its ID, location, and altitude unless operating inside an FAA-Recognized Identification Area (FRIA). Michigan does not add state-level Remote ID requirements beyond federal mandate.

LAANC Authorization

Required for flights in controlled airspace around Michigan airports

LAANC (Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability) is required for operations in Class B, C, D, and surface-E airspace. Available at 726 airports nationwide through FAA-approved service providers. Michigan's major airports (DTW, GRR, LAN, FNT) all have LAANC coverage. Authorizations can typically be obtained in near-real time for flights under 400 feet.

Stadium TFRs

Federal temporary flight restrictions apply within 3 nautical miles of major stadiums during covered events

14 CFR § 99.7 prohibits drone operation within a 3 NM radius of stadiums seating 30,000+ during MLB, NFL, NCAA Division I football, and major motor-sport events, 1 hour before through 1 hour after. Michigan Stadium (largest in US at 107,601 seats), Ford Field, Comerica Park, and Little Caesars Arena all have active stadium TFRs. Violations are federal crimes with five-figure civil penalties and possible criminal arrest.

National Park Service Drone Ban

Complete prohibition on drone operations on all NPS lands under Policy Memorandum 14-05

36 CFR § 1.5 prohibits launching, landing, or operating drones on all National Park Service lands. In Michigan, this affects Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Isle Royale National Park, and Keweenaw National Historical Park. Violations are federal petty offenses (up to 6 months and $5,000). Isle Royale adds Wilderness Act designation (§ 4(c)) motorized equipment ban on top of NPS prohibition.

Critical Infrastructure Protection

Federal laws protect critical infrastructure from unauthorized drone operations

While Michigan lacks a dedicated state critical infrastructure statute, federal laws and MCL § 750.45a apply to unauthorized operations near power plants, refineries, water treatment facilities, airports, and correctional facilities. The SHIELD package (pending) would add state-level critical infrastructure definitions and trespass prohibitions.

Cybersecurity and Data Protection

Federal drone cybersecurity standards apply; pending state legislation may add requirements

The pending HB 5330 would add state-level cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones. Currently, only federal standards apply (e.g., FAA regulations on data links and communication security). State adoption of stricter standards may follow federal baseline.

For complete federal regulations, see our Federal Regulations page.

Federal Preemption & Critical Infrastructure

Mich. Comp. Laws § 259.322 (Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act)Operation of UAS — interference with key facility, correctional facility, or law enforcement facility prohibited

Penalty: Misdemeanor (penalty under § 259.323); § 259.320 also criminalizes any drone-assisted commission of an underlying crime

FAA authorization carve-out: Yes

Covered categories

Key facility under MCL 750.552c: power plants, generation, transmission, substationsWater intake structure or treatment facilityNatural gas utility facilityGasoline, propane, LNG, or other fuel terminal/storage facilityTransportation facility (ports, railroad switching yards, trucking terminals)Telecommunication facility (central offices, cellular towers)Correctional facilityLaw enforcement facility
The 'key facility' list is incorporated by cross-reference to MCL 750.552c rather than enumerated in the UAS Act itself; check both sections when assessing coverage.
8

Airspace & LAANC

LAANC Coverage

LAANC is available at 726 airports nationwide and is required for operations in Class B, C, D, and surface-E airspace. Detroit Metro (DTW) is Class B with extensive coverage across southeast Michigan. Grand Rapids (GRR), Lansing (LAN), and Flint (FNT) are Class C airports with LAANC availability. Multiple Class D rings cover other Michigan airports (e.g., TVC, AZO, LAN).

Major Airports

  • DTW — Detroit Metro Airport (Class B)
  • GRR — Gerald R. Ford International Airport, Grand Rapids (Class C)
  • LAN — Capital Region International Airport, Lansing (Class C)
  • FNT — Bishop International Airport, Flint (Class C)
  • TVC — Cherry Capital Airport, Traverse City (Class D)
  • AZO — Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International Airport (Class C)
  • MKG — Muskegon County Airport (Class D)
  • MSN — Ingham County Airport (Class D)

TFR Notice

Permanent stadium TFRs apply within 3 nautical miles of Michigan Stadium (107,601 seats), Ford Field, Comerica Park, and Little Caesars Arena during covered events. TFRs extend 1 hour before through 1 hour after event start/end. Military TFRs exist around Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Camp Grayling, and Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center. NPS-administered lands (Sleeping Bear Dunes, Pictured Rocks, Isle Royale) impose complete drone bans. Sleeping Bear Dunes wraps Leelanau and Benzie County coastlines. Active TFRs may be issued for special events, law enforcement operations, and emergency management situations.

9

Recent Enforcement Actions & News

Oscoda Township Police Drone Shot Down During Standoff

enforcement

Alexander J. Bessey, 21, shot a police DJI Air 3 drone with a shotgun during a law enforcement standoff. He was charged with two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon, malicious destruction of police property, felony firearm possession, and reckless discharge of a firearm. Multiple firearms were seized from his property. The case tests intersection of drone interference law and destruction of police property statutes.

February 11, 2025Source

Michigan Introduces SHIELD Drone Package

legislation

The 103rd Michigan Legislature introduced a 15-bill drone regulation cluster (HB 5319-5332, SB 525, SB 210) anchored by HB 5319 (critical infrastructure trespass). The package proposes mandatory smartphone app registration, police drone takedown authority, geofencing requirements, standardized no-drone-zone signage, restrictions on DJI and covered UAS purchases, cybersecurity requirements, and a $20-40 million state sensor network. Total estimated cost: up to $60 million.

December 1, 2024Source

Long Lake Township v. Maxon — Michigan Supreme Court Drone Privacy Decision

regulatory change

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in a 15 N.W.3d 118 (Mich. 2024) decision that the exclusionary rule does not apply in civil zoning enforcement proceedings, even when drone surveillance may have intruded on reasonable expectation of privacy. The Court of Appeals' reasoning that low-altitude drone photography can intrude on privacy expectations remains persuasive authority and influences police and municipal drone programs.

June 1, 2024Source

Genesee County Parks Preemption Case — Harrison v. Genesee County

enforcement

Judge Farah granted a permanent injunction against Genesee County Parks for violating MCL 259.305 preemption by repeatedly confronting and once handcuffing drone pilot Jason Harrison for flying legally. The ruling established that local park authorities cannot ban drones on their own.

January 1, 2023Source

Mackinac Island Drone Confiscation Incident

enforcement

A visitor from Indiana flew a recreational quadcopter from the Mackinac Island ferry dock in July 2023. Mackinac Island Police pulled him aside within 10 minutes, cited him, and confiscated the aircraft. No criminal charges stuck, but the citation and confiscation stand as a practical enforcement priority under MSHP park rules.

July 1, 2023Source

Pending Legislation

HB 5319Referred to Second Reading

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; prohibit

Would amend MCL § 750.45a to prohibit flying over or trespassing on key facilities or critical infrastructure with drones. Anchor bill of the SHIELD package. Includes enhanced sentencing guidelines (HB 5320).

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5320Referred to Second Reading

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; provide for

Companion to HB 5319. Would establish sentencing guidelines for critical infrastructure violations. Tied to HB 5319.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5321Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path

Would create a database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles and provide penalties for unauthorized operation in restricted zones. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5323Referred to Second Reading

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; installation of geofencing around critical infrastructure or buildings; allow

Would allow geofencing technology to be installed around critical infrastructure or buildings to prevent unauthorized drone access. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5324Referred to Second Reading

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; adoption of an official no drone zone sign for use in this state; provide for

Would establish standardized no-drone-zone signage for use throughout Michigan. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5325Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; destruction of drones flying in violation of critical infrastructure guidelines; allow

Would authorize destruction of drones flying in violation of critical infrastructure guidelines. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5326Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; destruction of drones flying in violation of Federal Aviation Administration guidelines; allow

Would authorize destruction of drones flying in violation of FAA guidelines. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5327Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

Crimes: trespassing; downing of a trespassing drone; allow

Would amend MCL § 259.322 to allow individuals to down drones that are trespassing on their property. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5328Referred to Second Reading

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; drones used by state government; require to follow the federal restricted drone list

Would require all drones used by state government to comply with federal restricted drone lists (implicitly targeting DJI and covered UAS). Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5329Reported with Recommendation

State management: funds; use of state funds for purchase of certain drones; prohibit

Would prohibit state use of funds to purchase certain drones (read: DJI and covered UAS). Tied to HB 5330. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5330Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones; provide for

Would establish state-level cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones. Part of SHIELD package. Tied to HB 5329.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5331Reported with Recommendation and Substitute

State management: funds; use of state funds for purchase of certain drones; prohibit

Alternative version of HB 5329 (prohibition on state purchase of certain drones). Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: March 10, 2026

HB 5332Referred to Second Reading

Law enforcement: funds; purchase or use of certain drones by public agencies; prohibit

Would prohibit law enforcement and public agencies from purchasing or using certain drones (read: DJI and covered UAS). Tied to HB 5330. Part of SHIELD package.

Last action: April 30, 2026

SB 210Referred to Committee on Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public Safety

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; operating unmanned aircraft system near critical infrastructure; prohibit

Would prohibit operating a UAS near critical infrastructure. Similar to HB 5319 but at Senate level.

Last action: April 16, 2025

SB 525Referred to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; exceptions to prohibited use of an unmanned aircraft system; expand

Would expand exceptions to prohibited UAS use under MCL § 259.307. Has passed Senate (March 11, 2026) and been referred to House Transportation.

Last action: March 11, 2026

10

University & College Drone Policies

InstitutionPolicy SummaryPermit RequiredContact
University of Michigan

U-M prohibits drone operations over any campus or property without prior authorization through the Institutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC). The policy requires approval from the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Ann Arbor campus) or respective Chancellor (Dearborn/Flint campuses). Michigan Stadium, the largest stadium in the US, has strict TFR enforcement during home football games. Indoor drone operations are permitted in designated university spaces with established safety policies.

Restrictions: Outdoor UAS flights prohibited without executive waiver. Michigan Stadium TFR strictly enforced during athletic events. No flights over medical campus. Indoor use allowed only in buildings with established UAS safety procedures and with building manager approval. Law enforcement exceptions apply.

YesInstitutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC) / Office of Campus Safety & Security — campussafety@umich.edu / research.umich.edu
Michigan State University

MSU requires all drone flights on campus to be approved by the Office of Regulatory Affairs and campus police. Spartan Stadium (capacity 75,525) has active TFR enforcement during home football games and major events. The university maintains coordination with law enforcement and emergency services for approved operations.

Restrictions: All outdoor drone operations require Office of Regulatory Affairs approval. Spartan Stadium TFR during events. No flights over campus buildings without explicit authorization. Law enforcement operations exempt.

YesOffice of Regulatory Affairs / MSU Police Department — police@msu.edu
University drone policies may change. Contact the institution directly to confirm current requirements before flying on campus.
11

Last Updated

Last verified:

This page is automatically verified and updated weekly by our AI-powered legal research agent (v1.0.0). While we strive for accuracy, always verify critical information with official state sources.

12

Stay Compliant

Stay Compliant. Stay Organized.

Now that you know Michigan's drone laws, let PilotLedger help you stay on top of compliance. Manage your quotes, invoices, clients, and run your drone business from one platform.