Michigan Drone Laws
Complete guide for commercial and recreational UAS operators
State Overview
Michigan maintains a moderate regulatory posture with statewide preemption of local drone ordinances, strong privacy and harassment protections, and targeted restrictions on critical infrastructure and wildlife interference. The state lacks a dedicated critical infrastructure statute but is actively considering comprehensive new drone regulations through the pending SHIELD package.
State Drone Laws
MCL § 259.301 et seq.Michigan Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act
Michigan's core drone statute (Public Act 436 of 2016) establishes statewide ground rules for drone conduct, creates the Michigan UAS framework, and preempts almost all local regulation of drone ownership and operation.
MCL § 259.305Preemption of Local Drone Regulation
Political subdivisions (cities, villages, townships, counties) are prohibited from enacting or enforcing ordinances or resolutions that regulate the ownership or operation of unmanned aircraft, except for regulation of the subdivision's own UAS fleet or locally-owned airports.
MCL § 259.321Interference with Emergency Responders
Knowingly and intentionally operating a UAS in a manner that interferes with the official duties of police, fire, search-and-rescue, EMS, or other emergency-response officials is prohibited.
MCL § 259.322Harassment, Stalking, and Personal Protection Order Violations
Prohibits knowingly and intentionally operating a UAS to violate terms of a personal protection order, subject another person to harassment or stalking under MCL § 750.411h or § 750.411i, or capture photographs, video, or audio of another person in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress. Also prohibits registered sex offenders from using a UAS to follow, contact, or capture images of a minor.
MCL § 750.539jSurveillance of Private Place
Makes it unlawful to surveil, photograph, or film an individual in a 'private place' (where a person reasonably expects privacy) without consent. Applies to drone operators hovering cameras at bedroom windows or over fenced yards.
MCL § 750.539cTwo-Party Consent for Audio Recording
Michigan is a two-party-consent state for recording oral communications. A drone carrying a live microphone that picks up a private conversation without the consent of every party violates this statute.
MCL § 324.40111cWildlife Interference and Hunting Prohibition
Prohibits using a UAS to assist in the taking of an animal, locate game, or harass an animal. Narrow exception exists for recovering a downed, lawfully taken deer, elk, or bear only if no one in the hunting party is actively hunting at the time of the recovery flight.
Mich. Admin. Code R. 318.146Mackinac Island State Park Commission Unmanned Aircraft Rule
Prohibits the use or operation of an unmanned aircraft without proper written permission on Mackinac Island State Park Commission-administered lands.
DNR Order 5.1 (State Parks and Recreation Areas)Michigan DNR Unmanned Aircraft Policy in State Parks
Prohibits drone operation that interferes with DNR employees performing duties, interferes with search and rescue operations, within 100 yards of cultural or historical sites/structures, over occupied beach areas, equestrian facilities, restrooms, open-air changing courts, or areas subject to aerial right-of-way. Commercial operations require written DNR permission.
MCL § 750.45aInterference with Key or Critical Facility
Prohibits interference with key or critical facilities. While Michigan lacks a dedicated drone-specific critical infrastructure statute, this general statute has been interpreted to apply to unauthorized drone operations near critical facilities.
Local/Municipal Ordinances
Town of West Bloomfield
townshipParks No-Fly Zone Ordinance
Establishes all town parks managed by West Bloomfield Parks and Recreation Commission as drone no-fly zones.
Restrictions
Recreational and commercial drone operations prohibited in all West Bloomfield parks
University of Michigan
cityUniversity of Michigan Policy on Operation of UAS
Prohibits operation of drones over any University of Michigan campus or property except when prior authorization has been granted through an application process reviewed by the Institutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC) and approved by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Restrictions
Outdoor UAS operations banned without waiver. Indoor operations allowed in buildings with established UAS safety policies with building manager permission. Exceptions for law enforcement and designated outdoor locations.
Mt. Brighton Ski Resort
cityVail Resorts Property Drone Policy
Prohibits recreational and commercial drone use by guests or members of the public on Vail Resorts property, except in limited circumstances when an approved operator has obtained FAA exemption and written resort permission.
Restrictions
No drone use without FAA exemption and resort approval. Limited exceptions for special events, marketing, and film/photo applications with prior written authorization.
Penalty & Fine Schedule
| Violation | Classification | Fine Range | Imprisonment | Enforcement | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment, stalking, PPO violation via UAS (MCL § 259.322(1)-(3)) | Misdemeanor | Up to $500 | Up to 90 days | Michigan State Police, County Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement | Sentencing judges may impose probation and no-contact conditions |
| Registered sex offender UAS operation against minor (MCL § 259.322(4)) | Misdemeanor | Up to $500 | Up to 90 days | Michigan State Police, County Prosecutors | Sex offenders prohibited from using UAS to follow, contact, or photograph minors |
| Emergency responder interference (MCL § 259.321) | Misdemeanor | Up to $500 | Up to 90 days | Michigan State Police, County Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement | Applies to police, fire, EMS, search-and-rescue |
| Surveillance of private place (MCL § 750.539j) | Misdemeanor (first offense); Felony (repeat) | Up to $2,000 (first); Up to $5,000 (repeat) | Up to 2 years (first); Up to 5 years (repeat) | County Prosecutors, Local Law Enforcement | Applies to filming in locations where reasonable expectation of privacy exists |
| Non-consensual audio recording (MCL § 750.539c) | Felony | Up to $2,000 | Up to 2 years | County Prosecutors | Two-party consent required for recording oral communications; applies to drone-mounted microphones |
| Wildlife interference / hunting aid (MCL § 324.40111c) | Misdemeanor (first); Misdemeanor with enhancement (repeat) | $500-$1,000 (first); $1,000-$2,500 (repeat) | Up to 90 days (first); Up to 1 year (repeat) | DNR Conservation Officers | Hunting/fishing license revocation possible; report violations to 1-800-292-7800 |
| Interference with critical or correctional facility (MCL § 750.45a) | Felony | Up to $2,500 | Up to 4 years | Federal authorities, County Prosecutors | Addresses interference with power plants, refineries, water treatment facilities |
| Unauthorized UAS operation on Mackinac Island State Park land (Mich. Admin. Code R. 318.146) | Administrative | Confiscation | None | Mackinac State Historic Parks Rangers | Aircraft subject to confiscation on spot; written permit required from park superintendent |
| UAS operation in DNR state park without permit (DNR Order 5.1) | Administrative | Permit denial, potential confiscation | None | DNR Parks and Recreation Division, DNR Conservation Officers | Applies to all state-managed land; 100-yard buffer from cultural sites enforced |
| Stadium TFR violation (14 CFR § 99.7) | Federal violation (civil and criminal) | Five-figure civil penalties typical | Possible federal criminal charges | FAA, Federal law enforcement | Applies within 3 nautical miles of stadiums with 30,000+ seats during covered events |
| NPS land drone operation (36 CFR § 1.5) | Federal petty offense | Up to $5,000 | Up to 6 months | National Park Service, U.S. Magistrate Court (Western District of Michigan) | Applies to Sleeping Bear Dunes, Pictured Rocks, Isle Royale, Keweenaw NHP |
Harassment, stalking, PPO violation via UAS (MCL § 259.322(1)-(3))
Sentencing judges may impose probation and no-contact conditions
Registered sex offender UAS operation against minor (MCL § 259.322(4))
Sex offenders prohibited from using UAS to follow, contact, or photograph minors
Emergency responder interference (MCL § 259.321)
Applies to police, fire, EMS, search-and-rescue
Surveillance of private place (MCL § 750.539j)
Applies to filming in locations where reasonable expectation of privacy exists
Non-consensual audio recording (MCL § 750.539c)
Two-party consent required for recording oral communications; applies to drone-mounted microphones
Wildlife interference / hunting aid (MCL § 324.40111c)
Hunting/fishing license revocation possible; report violations to 1-800-292-7800
Interference with critical or correctional facility (MCL § 750.45a)
Addresses interference with power plants, refineries, water treatment facilities
Unauthorized UAS operation on Mackinac Island State Park land (Mich. Admin. Code R. 318.146)
Aircraft subject to confiscation on spot; written permit required from park superintendent
UAS operation in DNR state park without permit (DNR Order 5.1)
Applies to all state-managed land; 100-yard buffer from cultural sites enforced
Stadium TFR violation (14 CFR § 99.7)
Applies within 3 nautical miles of stadiums with 30,000+ seats during covered events
NPS land drone operation (36 CFR § 1.5)
Applies to Sleeping Bear Dunes, Pictured Rocks, Isle Royale, Keweenaw NHP
Registration Requirements
State Registration
Not Required
State Permit
Required
State Insurance
Not Required
Michigan does not require separate state-level drone registration. Federal FAA registration ($5 per drone for 3 years) is the only registration requirement for drones over 0.55 pounds.
State-level permits required for commercial operations on DNR-managed land (state parks, state forests, recreation areas) and all operations on Mackinac Island State Park Commission land. DNR commercial-filming permits required in addition to standard Part 107 credentials. Local parks may also require advance permission for takeoff/landing on municipally-owned property.
Not required by state law, but $1 million general liability coverage is commonly required by commercial clients. Insurance is recommended for recreational operators.
Applicable Federal Regulations
FAA Part 107 Certification
Commercial drone operations in Michigan must comply with FAA Part 107 Small UAS Rule requirements
All commercial drone pilots in Michigan must obtain an FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate by passing the FAA Aeronautical Knowledge Test ($175 fee). The certificate is valid for 24 months and requires recurrent testing. Michigan has PSI testing centers in Detroit, Grand Rapids, Lansing, Ann Arbor, Traverse City, and Marquette. Part 107 compliance is enforced by the FAA at the federal level; Michigan does not add separate commercial licensing requirements.
Recreational Drone TRUST Certification
All recreational drone pilots in Michigan must pass the FAA's TRUST (Recreational UAS Safety Test)
Recreational pilots must pass the free, online TRUST test before flying and carry proof of certification. The test is available through FAA-approved test administrators and covers safety, airspace, and regulatory requirements. Michigan does not add separate recreational licensing; FAA TRUST is the baseline requirement.
FAA Remote ID
All drones flown outdoors in Michigan must broadcast Remote ID information
Mandatory since March 16, 2024. Every drone flown outdoors must broadcast its ID, location, and altitude unless operating inside an FAA-Recognized Identification Area (FRIA). Michigan does not add state-level Remote ID requirements beyond federal mandate.
LAANC Authorization
Required for flights in controlled airspace around Michigan airports
LAANC (Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability) is required for operations in Class B, C, D, and surface-E airspace. Available at 726 airports nationwide through FAA-approved service providers. Michigan's major airports (DTW, GRR, LAN, FNT) all have LAANC coverage. Authorizations can typically be obtained in near-real time for flights under 400 feet.
Stadium TFRs
Federal temporary flight restrictions apply within 3 nautical miles of major stadiums during covered events
14 CFR § 99.7 prohibits drone operation within a 3 NM radius of stadiums seating 30,000+ during MLB, NFL, NCAA Division I football, and major motor-sport events, 1 hour before through 1 hour after. Michigan Stadium (largest in US at 107,601 seats), Ford Field, Comerica Park, and Little Caesars Arena all have active stadium TFRs. Violations are federal crimes with five-figure civil penalties and possible criminal arrest.
National Park Service Drone Ban
Complete prohibition on drone operations on all NPS lands under Policy Memorandum 14-05
36 CFR § 1.5 prohibits launching, landing, or operating drones on all National Park Service lands. In Michigan, this affects Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Isle Royale National Park, and Keweenaw National Historical Park. Violations are federal petty offenses (up to 6 months and $5,000). Isle Royale adds Wilderness Act designation (§ 4(c)) motorized equipment ban on top of NPS prohibition.
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Federal laws protect critical infrastructure from unauthorized drone operations
While Michigan lacks a dedicated state critical infrastructure statute, federal laws and MCL § 750.45a apply to unauthorized operations near power plants, refineries, water treatment facilities, airports, and correctional facilities. The SHIELD package (pending) would add state-level critical infrastructure definitions and trespass prohibitions.
Cybersecurity and Data Protection
Federal drone cybersecurity standards apply; pending state legislation may add requirements
The pending HB 5330 would add state-level cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones. Currently, only federal standards apply (e.g., FAA regulations on data links and communication security). State adoption of stricter standards may follow federal baseline.
For complete federal regulations, see our Federal Regulations page.
Federal Preemption & Critical Infrastructure
Mich. Comp. Laws § 259.322 (Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act) — Operation of UAS — interference with key facility, correctional facility, or law enforcement facility prohibited
Penalty: Misdemeanor (penalty under § 259.323); § 259.320 also criminalizes any drone-assisted commission of an underlying crime
FAA authorization carve-out: Yes
Covered categories
The 'key facility' list is incorporated by cross-reference to MCL 750.552c rather than enumerated in the UAS Act itself; check both sections when assessing coverage.
Airspace & LAANC
LAANC Coverage
LAANC is available at 726 airports nationwide and is required for operations in Class B, C, D, and surface-E airspace. Detroit Metro (DTW) is Class B with extensive coverage across southeast Michigan. Grand Rapids (GRR), Lansing (LAN), and Flint (FNT) are Class C airports with LAANC availability. Multiple Class D rings cover other Michigan airports (e.g., TVC, AZO, LAN).
Major Airports
DTW — Detroit Metro Airport (Class B)GRR — Gerald R. Ford International Airport, Grand Rapids (Class C)LAN — Capital Region International Airport, Lansing (Class C)FNT — Bishop International Airport, Flint (Class C)TVC — Cherry Capital Airport, Traverse City (Class D)AZO — Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International Airport (Class C)MKG — Muskegon County Airport (Class D)MSN — Ingham County Airport (Class D)
TFR Notice
Permanent stadium TFRs apply within 3 nautical miles of Michigan Stadium (107,601 seats), Ford Field, Comerica Park, and Little Caesars Arena during covered events. TFRs extend 1 hour before through 1 hour after event start/end. Military TFRs exist around Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Camp Grayling, and Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center. NPS-administered lands (Sleeping Bear Dunes, Pictured Rocks, Isle Royale) impose complete drone bans. Sleeping Bear Dunes wraps Leelanau and Benzie County coastlines. Active TFRs may be issued for special events, law enforcement operations, and emergency management situations.
Recent Enforcement Actions & News
Oscoda Township Police Drone Shot Down During Standoff
enforcementAlexander J. Bessey, 21, shot a police DJI Air 3 drone with a shotgun during a law enforcement standoff. He was charged with two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon, malicious destruction of police property, felony firearm possession, and reckless discharge of a firearm. Multiple firearms were seized from his property. The case tests intersection of drone interference law and destruction of police property statutes.
Michigan Introduces SHIELD Drone Package
legislationThe 103rd Michigan Legislature introduced a 15-bill drone regulation cluster (HB 5319-5332, SB 525, SB 210) anchored by HB 5319 (critical infrastructure trespass). The package proposes mandatory smartphone app registration, police drone takedown authority, geofencing requirements, standardized no-drone-zone signage, restrictions on DJI and covered UAS purchases, cybersecurity requirements, and a $20-40 million state sensor network. Total estimated cost: up to $60 million.
Long Lake Township v. Maxon — Michigan Supreme Court Drone Privacy Decision
regulatory changeThe Michigan Supreme Court ruled in a 15 N.W.3d 118 (Mich. 2024) decision that the exclusionary rule does not apply in civil zoning enforcement proceedings, even when drone surveillance may have intruded on reasonable expectation of privacy. The Court of Appeals' reasoning that low-altitude drone photography can intrude on privacy expectations remains persuasive authority and influences police and municipal drone programs.
Genesee County Parks Preemption Case — Harrison v. Genesee County
enforcementJudge Farah granted a permanent injunction against Genesee County Parks for violating MCL 259.305 preemption by repeatedly confronting and once handcuffing drone pilot Jason Harrison for flying legally. The ruling established that local park authorities cannot ban drones on their own.
Mackinac Island Drone Confiscation Incident
enforcementA visitor from Indiana flew a recreational quadcopter from the Mackinac Island ferry dock in July 2023. Mackinac Island Police pulled him aside within 10 minutes, cited him, and confiscated the aircraft. No criminal charges stuck, but the citation and confiscation stand as a practical enforcement priority under MSHP park rules.
Pending Legislation
HB 5319Referred to Second ReadingAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; prohibit
Would amend MCL § 750.45a to prohibit flying over or trespassing on key facilities or critical infrastructure with drones. Anchor bill of the SHIELD package. Includes enhanced sentencing guidelines (HB 5320).
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5320Referred to Second ReadingCriminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for flying over or trespassing on a key facility or critical infrastructure with an unmanned aircraft or vehicle; provide for
Companion to HB 5319. Would establish sentencing guidelines for critical infrastructure violations. Tied to HB 5319.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5321Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path
Would create a database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles and provide penalties for unauthorized operation in restricted zones. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5323Referred to Second ReadingAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; installation of geofencing around critical infrastructure or buildings; allow
Would allow geofencing technology to be installed around critical infrastructure or buildings to prevent unauthorized drone access. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5324Referred to Second ReadingAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; adoption of an official no drone zone sign for use in this state; provide for
Would establish standardized no-drone-zone signage for use throughout Michigan. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5325Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; destruction of drones flying in violation of critical infrastructure guidelines; allow
Would authorize destruction of drones flying in violation of critical infrastructure guidelines. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5326Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; destruction of drones flying in violation of Federal Aviation Administration guidelines; allow
Would authorize destruction of drones flying in violation of FAA guidelines. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5327Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteCrimes: trespassing; downing of a trespassing drone; allow
Would amend MCL § 259.322 to allow individuals to down drones that are trespassing on their property. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5328Referred to Second ReadingAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; drones used by state government; require to follow the federal restricted drone list
Would require all drones used by state government to comply with federal restricted drone lists (implicitly targeting DJI and covered UAS). Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5329Reported with RecommendationState management: funds; use of state funds for purchase of certain drones; prohibit
Would prohibit state use of funds to purchase certain drones (read: DJI and covered UAS). Tied to HB 5330. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5330Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones; provide for
Would establish state-level cybersecurity and data protection requirements for drones. Part of SHIELD package. Tied to HB 5329.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5331Reported with Recommendation and SubstituteState management: funds; use of state funds for purchase of certain drones; prohibit
Alternative version of HB 5329 (prohibition on state purchase of certain drones). Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: March 10, 2026
HB 5332Referred to Second ReadingLaw enforcement: funds; purchase or use of certain drones by public agencies; prohibit
Would prohibit law enforcement and public agencies from purchasing or using certain drones (read: DJI and covered UAS). Tied to HB 5330. Part of SHIELD package.
Last action: April 30, 2026
SB 210Referred to Committee on Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public SafetyAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; operating unmanned aircraft system near critical infrastructure; prohibit
Would prohibit operating a UAS near critical infrastructure. Similar to HB 5319 but at Senate level.
Last action: April 16, 2025
SB 525Referred to Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureAeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; exceptions to prohibited use of an unmanned aircraft system; expand
Would expand exceptions to prohibited UAS use under MCL § 259.307. Has passed Senate (March 11, 2026) and been referred to House Transportation.
Last action: March 11, 2026
University & College Drone Policies
| Institution | Policy Summary | Permit Required | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Michigan | U-M prohibits drone operations over any campus or property without prior authorization through the Institutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC). The policy requires approval from the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Ann Arbor campus) or respective Chancellor (Dearborn/Flint campuses). Michigan Stadium, the largest stadium in the US, has strict TFR enforcement during home football games. Indoor drone operations are permitted in designated university spaces with established safety policies. Restrictions: Outdoor UAS flights prohibited without executive waiver. Michigan Stadium TFR strictly enforced during athletic events. No flights over medical campus. Indoor use allowed only in buildings with established UAS safety procedures and with building manager approval. Law enforcement exceptions apply. | Yes | Institutional Autonomous Systems Committee (IASC) / Office of Campus Safety & Security — campussafety@umich.edu / research.umich.edu |
| Michigan State University | MSU requires all drone flights on campus to be approved by the Office of Regulatory Affairs and campus police. Spartan Stadium (capacity 75,525) has active TFR enforcement during home football games and major events. The university maintains coordination with law enforcement and emergency services for approved operations. Restrictions: All outdoor drone operations require Office of Regulatory Affairs approval. Spartan Stadium TFR during events. No flights over campus buildings without explicit authorization. Law enforcement operations exempt. | Yes | Office of Regulatory Affairs / MSU Police Department — police@msu.edu |
Last Updated
This page is automatically verified and updated weekly by our AI-powered legal research agent (v1.0.0). While we strive for accuracy, always verify critical information with official state sources.
Stay Compliant
Stay Compliant. Stay Organized.
Now that you know Michigan's drone laws, let PilotLedger help you stay on top of compliance. Manage your quotes, invoices, clients, and run your drone business from one platform.